With the August 2024 Windows security updates, Microsoft released a fix to address a Remote Code Execution vulnerability in the Windows TCP/IP stack (CVE-2024-38063). Critically, this vulnerability affects IPv6 only and does not require authentication or user interaction to exploit. An attacker would only need to send specially crafted IPv6 packets to a Windows host, which could allow them to run arbitrary code on the server. This vulnerability presents some unique challenges for organizations that have deployed DirectAccess.
Exposure
DirectAccess servers are deployed to provide secure remote access and are, necessarily, exposed to the public Internet. Sometimes, this is a direct connection (not recommended) or behind an edge firewall or load balancer. In either case, anyone can establish a TCP connection from the Internet to the DirectAccess server by default. If the DirectAccess server has a global unicast IPv6 address assigned to its external interface, that presents a worst-case scenario for exposure. Administrators should update their DirectAccess servers immediately. There are some other mitigation options, though. See below for more details.
IPv6 Transition
DirectAccess servers are usually reachable on the public Internet via IPv4 only. The lack of direct IPv6 connectivity significantly reduces the attack vector for this vulnerability. However, DirectAccess servers use various IPv6 transition technologies that could present additional risks.
Tunnel Establishment
Clients on the Internet can establish an IPv6 transition tunnel to the DirectAccess server without authentication. Once the tunnel is established, the client will receive a router advertisement (RA) and establish an IPv6 address on link. However, communication over the link requires IPsec. Although an attacker can obtain an IPv6 address, they require authentication to send TCP and UDP traffic inside the tunnel.
ICMP
It’s important to know that ICMP traffic inside the DirectAccess IPv6 transition tunnel is exempt from IPsec policy processing, by default. It is unclear whether the “specially crafted packets” an attacker must send to exploit this vulnerability can be ICMP packets. If that’s the case, this introduces significant risks and increases exposure exponentially. I will update this post if I learn anything more about this specifically.
Mitigation
The best and most obvious way to mitigate this attack is to immediately apply the Microsoft security updates. However, some additional controls can be effective in mitigating this risk.
Authentication
As mentioned, DirectAccess allows IPv6 transition tunnels to be established by default without authentication. However, it is possible to update the DirectAccess configuration to support authentication, as described here.
https://directaccess.richardhicks.com/2016/06/13/directaccess-ip-https-preauthentication/
Note: Updating the DirectAccess configuration can be impactful for remote users. Be sure to test this change in a lab environment before implementing in production.
Load Balancers
If the DirectAccess server is behind a load balancer, it can be configured to require authentication for DirectAccess IPv6 transition tunnels. Below is published guidance for configuring popular load balancers to support this.
Citrix ADC (formerly NetScaler)
Additional Information
Microsoft Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
DirectAccess IP-HTTPS Preauthentication
DirectAccess IP-HTTPS Preauthentication using F5 BIG-IP
DirectAccess IP-HTTPS Preauthentication using Citrix ADC (formerly NetScaler)
