SSL Offload for IP-HTTPS DirectAccess Traffic from Windows 7 Clients using F5 BIG-IP

From a client perspective, DirectAccess is an IPv6 only solution. It requires IPv6 connectivity from end-to-end to provide seamless, transparent, always-on remote access. DirectAccess clients are most commonly connected to the IPv4 Internet, so to overcome the limitations imposed by the exclusive use of IPv6 for transport, DirectAccess leverages IPv6 transition technologies such as 6to4, Teredo, or IP-HTTPS to tunnel IPv6 DirectAccess client communication over the IPv4 Internet. These transition protocols are favored by the operating system in the order in which I have listed them here. 6to4 uses IP protocol 41 for transport and requires that the client have a public IPv4 address, so if the DirectAccess client is behind a firewall that does not allow outbound IP protocol 41, or is located behind a NAT and has a private IPv4 address, it will fall back to Teredo. Teredo uses UDP for transport on port 3544, and if this communication is blocked by a firewall the DirectAccess client will then fall back to IP-HTTPS. IP-HTTPS, as its name implies, tunnels DirectAccess IPv6 traffic in HTTP, which is authenticated and encrypted using SSL or TLS.

Historically the challenge with the IP-HTTPS IPv6 transition protocol is that it encrypts DirectAccess communication which is already encrypted using IPsec. This double encryption places significant demands on CPU and memory resources on the DirectAccess server, resulting in poor throughput and performance and limiting the overall scalability of the solution. To address these shortcomings, Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess introduced support for IP-HTTPS NULL encryption. SSL/TLS is still used for authentication, but the IPsec traffic is no longer double encrypted. This dramatically reduces resource consumption on the DirectAccess server, resulting in improved performance and allowing many more DirectAccess clients to be handled by a single server. The only drawback is that IP-HTTPS NULL encryption is only supported with Windows 8 clients. When Windows 7 clients connect to a Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server using IP-HTTPS, they will continue to use encrypted IP-HTTPS.

An ideal solution would be to terminate SSL off box using a dedicated hardware appliance like the F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Unfortunately there is no provision in Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess to enable SSL termination for IP-HTTPS traffic. However, using some of the advanced features of the LTM, we can effectively offload SSL on the F5 by configuring LTM to emulate Windows 8 DirectAccess client behavior. This is accomplished by having the F5 LTM exclusively negotiate the use of a NULL encryption cipher suite with the Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server on behalf of Windows 7 DirectAccess clients.

Note: This post assumes that you are familiar with the configuration and management of the F5 BIG-IP LTM solution, and that you’ve already imported your SSL certificates and configured nodes, pools, and virtual servers for your Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server.

To configure the F5 LTM to provide SSL offload for Windows 7 DirectAccess clients, we’ll need to create SSL profiles to allow the use of specific cipher suites for our IP-HTTPS traffic. In its default configuration, the BIG-IP LTM does not support the use of NULL encryption cipher suites. Since Windows 8 DirectAccess clients use NULL cipher suites exclusively, we need to explicitly enable these on the LTM to support our Windows 8 clients. Since our Windows 7 clients will use only encrypted cipher suites, we’ll be sure to include those as well. To do this, open the F5 management console, expand Local Traffic, Profiles, SSL, and then click the green icon next to Client.

f5_directaccess_iphttps_offload_01

Provide a name for the new Client SSL Profile, select Advanced configuration, check the Custom box and specify DEFAULT:NULL for Ciphers. Be sure to select the appropriate SSL certificate and key. Click Finished at the bottom of the screen to save these settings. This change allows NULL cipher suites in addition to encrypted cipher suites, allowing us to support both Windows 8 and Windows 7 DirectAccess clients.

f5_directaccess_iphttps_offload_02

Next we need to configure the LTM to use only NULL cipher suites when communicating with the Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server. To do this, expand Profiles, SSL, and then click the green icon next to Server.

f5_directaccess_iphttps_offload_03

Provide a name for the new Server SSL Profile, select Advanced configuration, check the Custom box and specify NULL-SHA for Ciphers. Click Finished at the bottom of the screen to save these settings. The end result here will be to force the exclusive use NULL encryption cipher suites for all IP-HTTPS traffic, regardless if it is a Windows 8 or Windows 7 client.

f5_directaccess_iphttps_offload_04

Once you’ve completed the client and server SSL profiles, it will be necessary to assign these profiles to the virtual servers that represent your Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server. Navigate to Virtual Servers and click on Virtual Server List. Click the virtual server that corresponds to your DirectAccess server, and then scroll down to the bottom of the page. For SSL Profile (Client), select DA_IPHTTPS_CLIENT and add that to the list. Repeat this step for the SSL Profile (Server), this time selecting DA_IPHTTPS_SERVER. Click Update to apply these changes.

f5_directaccess_iphttps_offload_05

Once complete, the F5 BIG-IP LTM will now effectively be offloading SSL traffic on behalf of Windows 7 DirectAccess clients by emulating the Windows 8 DirectAccess client behavior and using only NULL encryption for IP-HTTPS sessions established with the Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server. Although I can see no issues with this deployment model, be advised that this configuration may not be supported by Microsoft, so make these changes at your own risk. I’ll be working with Microsoft and F5 to get this solution reviewed and tested and I will provide clarification on supportability here once I have that information.

Special thanks to Jeff Bellamy, Ryan Korock, and John Wagnon at F5 for their assistance with this developing solution.

ISATAP Recommendations for DirectAccess Deployments

ISATAP Recommendations for DirectAccess DeploymentsFrom a client perspective, DirectAccess is an IPv6 only solution. The client communicates with the DirectAccess server and intranet resources using IPv6 exclusively. To enable communication between DirectAccess clients and IPv4 only resources on the internal network, the DirectAccess servers uses two important protocol translatorsDNS64 and NAT64. Unfortunately DNS64 and NAT64 provide only inbound protocol translation, so another measure is required for communication initiated outbound to connected DirectAccess clients.

ISATAP

To support outbound communication originating from the Intranet to connect DirectAccess clients, the DirectAccess server is configured as an Intra-Site Automatic Tunnel Addressing Protocol (ISATAP) router. ISATAP is an IPv6 transition technology that allows hosts on the intranet to initiate outbound communication to DirectAccess clients on the Internet by tunneling IPv6 communication over the internal IPv4 network.

ISATAP can be enabled by populating internal DNS with a host record called ISATAP that resolves to the IPv4 address assigned to the Internal network adapter on the ISATAP router, in this case the DirectAccess server (don’t forget to remove ISATAP from the DNS global query block list!). When a client resolves ISATAP to an IP address successfully, it enables an ISATAP tunnel adapter and assigns itself an ISATAP IPv6 address. Once enabled, any host with an ISATAP tunnel adapter configured can initiate outbound communication to DirectAccess clients on the Internet.

Important note: It is not recommended to deploy ISATAP globally via DNS. See below for more details.

When configured and enabled, ISATAP opens up new and interesting network communication scenarios. For example, a helpdesk administrator can proactively initiate a remote desktop session to a remote client connected via DirectAccess to troubleshoot an application. Systems management engineers can push software out to DirectAccess clients without requiring an agent on the remote client to “phone home” to receive software updates. This model is often referred to as “manage out”.

Limitations

In the early days of DirectAccess with Windows Server 2008 R2 and Forefront UAG, configuring and enabling ISATAP as described above was standard operating procedure. However, we soon learned that there are some serious drawbacks to deploying ISATAP. While the DirectAccess manage out scenario is an important and frequently requested feature of a DirectAccess implementation, it often causes more trouble than it solves. In its default configuration, ISATAP is a global change that affects all hosts that can resolve the hostname ISATAP to an IP address. The challenge here is that this change can break or impair normal network communication for some hosts on the Intranet. For example, if an internal host is able to resolve a public hostname to an IPv6 address, it may attempt to connect to the site via ISATAP.

Unfortunately, in this scenario ISATAP does not lead to the public Internet. Rather, ISATAP is used to provide network connectivity exclusively for our DirectAccess clients. Since IPv6 is preferred in most modern operating system’s networking stacks, it can lead to failed or seriously delayed communication to Internet resources. In addition, once ISATAP is enabled globally there will be a lot of IPv6 communication taking place on the network, which in large enterprise networks can be a source of confusion for those individuals with the responsibility for monitoring the network.

ISATAP also suffers from a lack of robust monitoring tools for this very essential service. Additionally, ISATAP turns the OSI model upside down. ISATAP relies on upper-layer protocols (DNS) to provide its service. If there are issues with DNS that prevent proper name resolution, ISATAP routing will cease to function, which is fundamentally backward.

Targeted Deployment

ISATAP Recommendations for DirectAccess DeploymentsAs I mentioned earlier, ISATAP is a global setting by default. However, in most environments there will only be a few systems that will require the ability to initiate outbound communication from the internal network to remote DirectAccess clients. Typically these will be helpdesk administrators’ workstations or management systems. Today we are recommending that you deploy IPv6 on any internal systems that will participate in any DirectAccess manage out scenarios. Unfortunately this will not be possible in many cases, as additional network changes are often required to support IPv6 on the Intranet. In these cases we recommend that instead of configuring ISATAP in DNS globally, you target individual systems for ISATAP configuration as required. This can be accomplished in a number of ways.

Group Policy

This is recommended way to deploy ISATAP settings to systems that require DirectAccess manage out functionality. It is the easiest to manage and the most scalable as well. A unique ISATAP hostname (for example, DirectAccess-ISATAP) is created in the internal DNS that resolves to the internal IPv4 address of the DirectAccess server. Create a new GPO in Active Directory to assign it to management workstations using security group filtering or OU targeting. Edit the GPO setting Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Network > TCPIP Settings > IPv6 Transition Technologies > Set ISATAP State (Enabled and set to Enabled State) and > Set ISATAP Router Name (Enabled and enter the ISATAP hostname created previously).

ISATAP Recommendations for DirectAccess Deployments

PowerShell

Using PowerShell is an alternative method of configuring an individual system to use ISATAP. Although not as scalable as the group policy method, it is still very effective. On the system that requires network connectivity to DirectAccess clients, open an elevated PowerShell command window and run the following command:

Set-NetISATAPConfiguration -Router <NameOrIPAddress>

Netsh

Another command line method for configuring the ISATAP is to use netsh.exe. In an elevated command prompt window run the following command:

netsh interface isatap set router <NameOrIPAddress>

HOSTS File

This is the least desirable way to configure ISATAP, but I’ll mention it here because it is quick and simple and does work. On any system that requires ISATAP for DirectAccess manage out, simply edit the HOSTS file in C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\Etc and add a host record for ISATAP that resolves to the IPv4 address assigned to the internal network interface of the DirectAccess server. Obviously this is the least scalable alternative and should only be used in test environments or very small production networks.

Supportability

ISATAP is only supported for single server DirectAccess deployments. ISATAP will work when Network Load Balancing (NLB) is enabled, but it requires some additional configuration. ISATAP does not work when an external load balancer is in use and/or multisite is enabled. To restore manage out functionality for DirectAccess for load-balanced and multisite deployments, additional infrastructure and configuration is required. Fill out the form below to request more information.

Summary

As you can see there are numerous drawbacks to configuring ISATAP on a global scale. Fortunately there are simple and effective workarounds that allow you to target specific systems for ISATAP configuration. Choose the one that works best for you and have fun managing your DirectAccess clients!

Additional Information

DirectAccess Manage Out and Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM)

DirectAccess Client Firewall Rule Configuration for ISATAP Manage Out

DirectAccess Manage Out with ISATAP Fails on Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016

Contact Me!

Want to enable DirectAccess manage out for System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) remote control or Remote Desktop Connection (RDC) in load-balanced and multisite deployments? Fill out the form below for more information.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

DirectAccess and NAT

One of the more common barriers to adoption for DirectAccess in Windows Server 2008 R2 and Forefront Unified Access Gateway (UAG) 2010 is the strict requirement for two consecutive public IPv4 addresses to be assigned to the external network interface of the DirectAccess server. Many small and mid-sized businesses have only a single public IPv4 address, or have a very small range of public IPv4 addresses that are already in use. For large organizations, corporate security policies often dictate that Windows-based systems cannot be internet facing, and many object to having a domain-joined Windows system exposed directly to the Internet. Further complicating matters is the fact that deploying a Window Server 2008 R2 or Forefront UAG 2010 DirectAccess server behind a border router or edge firewall performing Network Address Translation (NAT) is explicitly not supported.

Beginning with Windows Server 2012, deploying the DirectAccess server behind a border router or edge firewall performing NAT is now fully supported. No longer is there a requirement to have public IPv4 addresses assigned to the DirectAccess server’s external network interface. In fact, DirectAccess in Windows Server 2012 can be deployed with a single network adapter, allowing the DirectAccess server to be completely isolated in a perimeter or DMZ network.

Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess Network Topology

Be advised that deploying a Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server behind a NAT device will result in all DirectAccess client communication being delivered to the server exclusively using the IP-HTTPS IPv6 transition protocol. If you are using Windows 8 clients, there’s nothing to worry about in terms of performance and scalability because Windows 8 clients leverage NULL encryption for IP-HTTPS traffic. However, Windows 7 clients cannot utilize NULL encryption and will instead encrypt all DirectAccess client communication using SSL/TLS. DirectAccess communication is already encrypted using IPsec, so this presents a problem. Double encryption places high demands on the DirectAccess server’s CPU and memory and will significantly impact performance on the client and the server. It will also impede the scalability of the solution by dramatically reducing the number of DirectAccess clients supported on a single DirectAccess server.

So, if you’re planning to deploy a Windows Server 2012 DirectAccess server behind a NAT, and you are also planning to support a lot of Windows 7 clients, please proceed cautiously. Monitor the DirectAccess server performance closely during your pilot and, if at all possible, offload SSL/TLS off box using F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) or equivalent device.